|
Prevention measures / minimum acceptable
standards
for running residential rehabilitation centers by NGOs / Child Rights
Organisations.
The following suggestions were given for the
formulation of guidelines by the TDH-G partners group in Karnataka,
consisting of about 22 NGOs. This is circulated with the hope that
this paper might help all concerned to work further on the matter.
- Location of the centers should be carefully chosen, isolated
places should be avoided and ensure community participation in the
running of the same.
- Residence cum office cum shelter should be avoided.
- Family members of Director and staff should not have access to
these centers.
- Separate accommodation for boys and girls in the rehabilitation
centers, exposure visits and in all the programmes.
- For any programme, girl children should be accompanied by female
staff.
- Male director and male staffs should not reside in the bridge
course premises.
- Philosophies and belief systems contrary to children’s rights
and accepted norms of ethics should not be preached or practiced
within the organisation and project areas.
- Creation of a climate for children to express.
- Training / orientation / sensitization programme for staff on
CSA.
- Alcoholic consumption, tobacco and toxic substances should not
be allowed in the premises and children should not be used for
purchase of the same.
- Each organisation should maintain its own manual and guidelines
- Visit register, movement register should be maintained
- Transfer of children from shelter to shelter should be recorded
and permission for the same should be obtained from the Board.
A Regular social audit by a team including persons
from the N.G.O’s and experts were suggested and accepted. It was
agreed that these steps will be implemented by all the Partner
Organisations.
Procedures for an incident of reported abuse
- Police complaint for reported case of molestation and above.
- Complete separation of victim from the accused and his aids.
- Accused suspended, pending enquiry and removed from the premises
and responsibilities.
A few months ago there occurred an
incident where allegedly the head of an NGO sexually abused a child
who was in his care. The handling of the case by some NGOs and State
Departments was appalling from all perspectives and resulted in
further violations of the said child’s rights. The incident was unduly
publicised, the child’s identity was revealed and her privacy was
violated. She was shunted from one institution to another, including
the State Juvenile Home, with little concern for her physical or
mental condition. Her needs and concerns did not seem to figure at all
in any of the so-called remedial interventions. All the children in
the child belonged to have also now become victims of these
circumstances.
This case has sparked off a wide
range of discussions among the NGO community regarding children’s
rights, the ‘best interests of the child’ and the need for a code of
conduct for NGO working with children. In this connection there have
been several meetings and in one such meeting a ‘code of conduct’
drafted by 22 TDH-G partners was circulated. This is attached.
This TDH ‘Code’ is very simplistic
and unreal. We, at the Concerned for Working Children are distressed
to note that several of the suggestions put forth by the 22
organisations are in effect attempts to segregate men and women, boys
and girls, in order to ‘protect’ them from abuse.
Such artificial divisions are not
only unrealistic, they are also very harmful. They set up ‘ghettos’
instead of creating an open and safe society. They are in fact
contrary to the vision many of us hold of a just and discrimination
free world in which men and women are partnership with each other. It
also does not seem to consider the possibility of persons of the same
sex abusing each other, or that abuse is not only sexual or physical.
This code does not go beyond the framework of physical abuse and
ignores issues such as emotional harassment, oppression, excessive
control, generation of fear, curtailment of self-expression etc.
We believe that in any given
situation children and their all-round wellbeing have to be our
primary and most important concern. As organisations committed to
children/s rights we have to develop and implement vigorous self
regulatory systems which are transparent and are accountable to the
children we work with, their communities and to the society.
The Concerned for Working Children
has Codes of Conduct on a variety of issues. The Code governing the
residential care of children covers issues such as recruitment,
induction, conflict and crisis management, counseling procedures,
reporting procedures etc. It also contains codes for adults who
accompany children. The resource persons and visitors too are required
to follows codes of conduct in keeping with vision of the organisation.
The children who are the residents of the Training Programme have an
elected body of children. This body is actively involved in the
running of the programmes as well as in monitoring and evaluation of
the entire programme, including the environment it takes place in.
Children have forums as well as several channels of communication they
have access to in order to express their opinions and experiences.
They also receive inputs in how and where to lodge complaints if
required.
We sincerely hope that there will be
no more knee-jerk reactions to the issue of Child Sexual Abuse. It is
a very complex area, which needs to be looked at with great
sensitivity, an in-depth understanding of children’s rights, human
psychology, societal structures, legal procedures and a host of other
issues.
There is also a considerable amount
of literature and experience already existing in this area. Let us
learn from them and move further ahead.
|