Karnataka Panchayati Raj Amendment 2007

Undermining the Foundations of Democracy

 

The Karnataka Panchayati Raj Amendment 2007 passed in the Legislative Council yesterday is a totally regressive move that undermines the powers and the mandate of the Panchayats in the State. Karnataka has been hailed as a ‘trail blazer’ in decentralisation in governance. However, this amendment is clearly one of the many moves that are geared towards taking away the powers from the very foundation of democracy.

 

This amendment blatantly violates the authority and mandate of the Panchayats as it imposes conditionality on the power of the Panchayats to identify beneficiaries – and hands it to ‘a committee headed by an MLAs’. In effect, this amendment violates the 73rd Amendment and also several legislations and orders that have been passed by State that highlight the actual transfer of powers and functions to the 3 tiers of Panchayats.

 

We request the Honourable Governor to study the serious demerits of this Bill and to refuse giving his assent to it, so that this amendment will not be passed and the commitment we have made as a state and a nation to devolve the powers to the Panchayats continues to be respected. 

 

We are absolutely appalled that Sri Udasi, being the Minister of Panchayat Raj, has tabled such a Bill and has supported its amendment. We are even more shocked that Sri B. K. Chandrashekar, the President of Legislative Council, who has often professed his support to the strengthening of the Panchayat Raj, actually cast his Vote in favour of the Bill – and it was his one vote that determined the fate of this Bill in the Legislative Council. We believe that both Sri Udasi and Sri B.K. Chandrashekar no longer have the moral right to continue in their present positions and demand their resignations.

 

In the recently held National Consultation that celebrated two decades of decentralisation in Karnataka, where over 1000 elected representatives from the village, taluk and zilla Panchayats took part – very strong voices were raised against the impingement of their rights by the MLAs. The representatives also refuted the immature argument for the diversion of power to the MLAs because of the alleged non-selection of genuine beneficiaries in schemes as Ashraya.

 

This amendment reflects the present lack of commitment to decentralisation and makes a mockery of the efforts of individuals like Sri. Nazir Sab, Sri. Ramakrishna Hegde and Sri. Rajeev Gandhi, who took radical steps to ensure that the decentralised civil society participation model that was born in Karnataka, finds its rightful place at the national level.

 

Kavita Ratna

Director - Communications

 

 

Back